Security Cameras: Fighting Crime or Invading Privacy?

88

By Security News

The mere presence of video surveillance cameras can help prevent crime, from a residential home invasion to business vandalism.
The mere presence of video surveillance cameras can help prevent crime, from a residential home invasion to business vandalism.

Security cameras are undoubtedly some of the most popular pieces of modern security equipment, and savvy citizens have probably noticed an increased presence of the devices in stores, on and around buildings, and in other locations. Cameras are well-loved primarily for their ability to both prevent and respond to crimes. While some criminals may think twice about their plans upon discovering the presence of security cameras, those who choose to go through with their deeds anyway are presented with a considerable hindrance –one that may effectively lead to their identification and capture. These basic goals of prevention and response serve as the main features of security cameras for many people, but there are also some who appreciate a camera's ability to effectively “spy” on the people it captures on video. This functionality is, unfortunately, an inextricable part of security camera technology, and it has led some people to denounce the increased use of cameras as an invasion of privacy. Whether a particular individual views these devices as useful tools for achieving quality security or dangerous items with negative implications for privacy largely depends on their own experience and perspective, though how security cameras are used plays a major role in how they're perceived.

There are two primary ways in which security cameras might create an invasion of privacy. The first involves live monitoring; when a camera or series of cameras sends a video feed to a set of monitors viewed by a person or group, those being captured by the cameras may feel that their privacy is being invaded. In many places, such as the walkways of a busy mall or a major parking lot, being watched via security camera monitors may not seem particularly invasive. When security cameras are placed in more intimate areas, however, such as dressing rooms or restaurants, those caught on tape may feel as though their every move is being watched, potentially making them feel uncomfortable. Though personnel charged with monitoring live security camera video feeds are typically trained professionals with considerable experience in handling such devices and data, those sensitive about their privacy may nevertheless dislike being watched while going about their daily lives.

The second way in which security cameras may pose a threat to personal privacy is through the recording of video. While some security camera systems are purely intended for live monitoring, the vast majorities take advantage of the ability to record and store video feeds on an accompanying device. With this feature, camera owners can scan tapes to view the activity of a suspected criminal once a crime has occurred. Of course, this capability also makes it possible for people to view non-criminals at their leisure, and some people may find that they're uncomfortable with the idea of a monitor having access to a videotape that has their activity recorded on it. Whether video feeds are reviewed as they're recorded or are retrieved for later viewing, it's unlikely in most circumstances that the viewers intend to invade the privacy of innocent people recorded by the cameras. This doesn't mean, however, that some camera users may have less than ideal intentions when making use of their equipment.

As security camera technology advances and the market for such products expands, accessing equipment is becoming ever easier, and a large number of home and private property owners are choosing to install cameras of their own. In an environment so open to camera installation and use, people concerned about privacy issues may feel that their sensitivities are largely ignored, but it's important for those against camera use to discuss their perspectives with others. As it is ultimately people, and not the cameras themselves, that create an invasion of privacy when it exists, it is people who need to adapt to proper camera use and to understand the issues surrounding camera operation. While installing a security camera system may be an attractive option for increasing home security, talking about the potential issues with family members beforehand is often a wise idea, and business owners concerned about the controversy of camera use may wish to hold a meeting with employees or even with local community members to get a feel for how a system can be comfortably implemented and conscientiously used.

For scores of people, security cameras represent strength in the face of criminal threats and the power to both prevent criminal acts and achieve justice when such acts occur. To others, however, these devices may seem like worrying tools for spying on private activity. Unfortunately, security cameras can serve both purposes quite well given their very nature. The goodness or wrongness of cameras, however, lies not in their construction or ability, but in the intention of the user; so long as people remain aware of proper camera use and fight usage that detracts from real security, cameras can deliver positive results.

Comments

Mike 5 days ago

Remember, the mere presence of video surveillance cameras can help prevent crime, from a residential home invasion to business vandalism. Furthermore, it can help obtain the evidence you need if a crime does actually happen. Video surveillance has been helpful in the conviction of many criminals. Often, if your cameras are positioned right, you can not only get a good image of a trespasser, but can even track his or her movement with different camera set-ups. Don't let the criminal have the upper hand.

lolipop gurl 5 days ago

i feel that they are taking it too far.

gabe 4 months ago

to many perverts around ,,, dont trust them

GoGreenTips profile image

GoGreenTips Level 5 Commenter 6 months ago

I think you made the correct statement when you said it was the people monitoring or using the camera that causes harm. Just like a gun, they in themselves will hurt noone unless they are pointed at someone and the trigger is pulled. This really goes for any technology, it is how we put it to use, rather than the technology itself.

Submit a Comment
Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.



    • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
    • Comments are not for promoting your Hubs or other sites

    Please wait working